Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Multiple Intelligences and Scheduling Activities--thoughts from Linda





 I love this response I got to my blog from my friend Linda!    It speaks to the multiple intelligences and spending times doing activities with your child.   It is really worthy of a careful read.  

I'm writing not as a parent but as a youth advocate and M.A. Ed. with 15 years working with home-schooled, alternatively-schooled and traditionally-schooled kids. And as someone who tends to think and write a lot about how we can provide sanity in the midst of the over-stimulation of this contemporary world, with my three wonderful nieces, ages 8, 10, and 13, in mind.



Great post, Peggy. I especially like your confessional, because in taking control of one's schedule, whether just for oneself or for the kids, we have to be willing to be real about our own proclivities as we figure out kids' temperaments.  I like the important lesson that there's no one way to do it "right." 



I am the same as you--I love myriad activities. As a kid I couldn't get enough of trying new things. I am happy my mom had me in ballet, art, roller skating, ice skating, gymnastics, swimming, tennis, piano, skiing lessons, pretty much anything I asked to do.... And I only wish we'd known about rock climbing and wilderness school! 


The thing I didn't do much of, that I look back and realize I truly wanted, is SHARED activities--I always wished my mom would do art or get in the pool or on the ski slope WITH me so we could--and this is perhaps the crux of it -- craft some narratives together. "Remember that time, when I fell on the bunny slope, and you had to help me up, and then you fell too..." 

I had those narratives, but only with other kids, not with adults. Of course I am sure my mom cherished the break time from her energetic kid. And she did sign us up once for a mother-daughter cooking class. THAT, of all the activities, really felt special, because she wanted to spend time with me. 



This is one reason I SO love and support the work you do, Peggy, to bring parents and kids together for shared self-exploration and getting to know our deep selves. It's so brilliant that you work with both at once, that your programs actually nurture the needs of both the child and the parent. I realize now that that was at the heart of what I wanted from my mom-- time for authentic exploration of "who are you? who am I??"



I'm aware that this is sounds at worst not helpful, or at best off-topic, in that it throws in yet another thing for parents to balance: kids and adults need their own activity time, their alone time, and, I'm saying here, it's the shared activity time that should not be overlooked.



Because the operative question, if you're a busy parent, is HOW to figure out the right balance, I'd like to suggest one heuristic: that we try configuring schedules of activities around something like the 'Multiple Intelligences' (Howard Gardner's theory)-- so that means you strive to allot time for the intelligences that are NOT covered by the school's curriculum and the soccer team etc. That would be the interpersonal, intrapersonal, existential/spiritual, and naturalistic ones. 



NATURALISTIC: Unless you go to a nature school or live on a working farm, engaging the natural world is not usually covered in the curriculum or in your home life. It would be nifty if something so elemental as learning to attune to our natural surroundings were not relegated to one week of camp in the summer, no?



INTERPERSONAL: Schools certainly provide important interpersonal learning time, or I should say "experimenting time", and they're slowly realizing the importance of offering actual social skills training--things like how to be a good friend, how to advocate for your needs, managing angry moments, etc. But because schools are mainly about kid-to-kid engagement, kids still need contexts for meaningfully engaging with other age-groups, including adults. (However, in my observation, this is sort of flipped for home-schooled kids, who often get a lot more practice with negotiating adult-kid engagement, but they may be  more challenged to get  interpersonal learning time with people their own age.)



EXISTENTIAL/SPIRITUAL: Unless your child goes to a Waldorf school or you have a spiritual activity in your weekly life, this part of a child's being doesn't get much exercise without overt planning and effort.



 INTRAPERSONAL: schools and extracurricular activities generally provide little or no self-reflective, self-actualizing type of inner-work opportunities; and parents are often bereft of ideas in this arena because they probably had little intrapersonal time with their own parents. This is why we're so blessed to have someone like you, Peggy, in our community, who creates programs just for this need to be met! 



So I'm aware that bringing up the arguably neglected intelligences is not necessarily helping lessen the stress of the parent who is already worried they are over-scheduling! But maybe if the paradigm, the criteria is adjusted to be about balancing TYPES of engagement, it will help both parents and kids feel more whole, more fulfilled by their activities, regardless of whether they are many or few.

Labels: ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

Creative Crossings. Peggy Rubens-Ellis, M.Ed. Certified Parent Coach: Multiple Intelligences and Scheduling Activities--thoughts from Linda

Multiple Intelligences and Scheduling Activities--thoughts from Linda





 I love this response I got to my blog from my friend Linda!    It speaks to the multiple intelligences and spending times doing activities with your child.   It is really worthy of a careful read.  

I'm writing not as a parent but as a youth advocate and M.A. Ed. with 15 years working with home-schooled, alternatively-schooled and traditionally-schooled kids. And as someone who tends to think and write a lot about how we can provide sanity in the midst of the over-stimulation of this contemporary world, with my three wonderful nieces, ages 8, 10, and 13, in mind.



Great post, Peggy. I especially like your confessional, because in taking control of one's schedule, whether just for oneself or for the kids, we have to be willing to be real about our own proclivities as we figure out kids' temperaments.  I like the important lesson that there's no one way to do it "right." 



I am the same as you--I love myriad activities. As a kid I couldn't get enough of trying new things. I am happy my mom had me in ballet, art, roller skating, ice skating, gymnastics, swimming, tennis, piano, skiing lessons, pretty much anything I asked to do.... And I only wish we'd known about rock climbing and wilderness school! 


The thing I didn't do much of, that I look back and realize I truly wanted, is SHARED activities--I always wished my mom would do art or get in the pool or on the ski slope WITH me so we could--and this is perhaps the crux of it -- craft some narratives together. "Remember that time, when I fell on the bunny slope, and you had to help me up, and then you fell too..." 

I had those narratives, but only with other kids, not with adults. Of course I am sure my mom cherished the break time from her energetic kid. And she did sign us up once for a mother-daughter cooking class. THAT, of all the activities, really felt special, because she wanted to spend time with me. 



This is one reason I SO love and support the work you do, Peggy, to bring parents and kids together for shared self-exploration and getting to know our deep selves. It's so brilliant that you work with both at once, that your programs actually nurture the needs of both the child and the parent. I realize now that that was at the heart of what I wanted from my mom-- time for authentic exploration of "who are you? who am I??"



I'm aware that this is sounds at worst not helpful, or at best off-topic, in that it throws in yet another thing for parents to balance: kids and adults need their own activity time, their alone time, and, I'm saying here, it's the shared activity time that should not be overlooked.



Because the operative question, if you're a busy parent, is HOW to figure out the right balance, I'd like to suggest one heuristic: that we try configuring schedules of activities around something like the 'Multiple Intelligences' (Howard Gardner's theory)-- so that means you strive to allot time for the intelligences that are NOT covered by the school's curriculum and the soccer team etc. That would be the interpersonal, intrapersonal, existential/spiritual, and naturalistic ones. 



NATURALISTIC: Unless you go to a nature school or live on a working farm, engaging the natural world is not usually covered in the curriculum or in your home life. It would be nifty if something so elemental as learning to attune to our natural surroundings were not relegated to one week of camp in the summer, no?



INTERPERSONAL: Schools certainly provide important interpersonal learning time, or I should say "experimenting time", and they're slowly realizing the importance of offering actual social skills training--things like how to be a good friend, how to advocate for your needs, managing angry moments, etc. But because schools are mainly about kid-to-kid engagement, kids still need contexts for meaningfully engaging with other age-groups, including adults. (However, in my observation, this is sort of flipped for home-schooled kids, who often get a lot more practice with negotiating adult-kid engagement, but they may be  more challenged to get  interpersonal learning time with people their own age.)



EXISTENTIAL/SPIRITUAL: Unless your child goes to a Waldorf school or you have a spiritual activity in your weekly life, this part of a child's being doesn't get much exercise without overt planning and effort.



 INTRAPERSONAL: schools and extracurricular activities generally provide little or no self-reflective, self-actualizing type of inner-work opportunities; and parents are often bereft of ideas in this arena because they probably had little intrapersonal time with their own parents. This is why we're so blessed to have someone like you, Peggy, in our community, who creates programs just for this need to be met! 



So I'm aware that bringing up the arguably neglected intelligences is not necessarily helping lessen the stress of the parent who is already worried they are over-scheduling! But maybe if the paradigm, the criteria is adjusted to be about balancing TYPES of engagement, it will help both parents and kids feel more whole, more fulfilled by their activities, regardless of whether they are many or few.

Labels: ,